Tag: gun violence

Sensible ways to reduce gun violence

Sensible ways to reduce gun violence

This is from the website of Americans for Responsible Solutions :

Americans for Responsible Solutions is working across the country to build an organization with millions of people committed to finding sensible ways to reduce gun violence and encouraging elected officials to enact responsible firearms policies that protect the Second Amendment. Today, ARS stands more than 500,000 strong.

I suppose I’m one of those half-million or so. I hope more will join and become a united voice for addressing gun violence. The organization is not that old and maybe it will be millions in the near future.

I hope our politicians come to realize that a large number of voters support this organization or some sort of gun laws that protect both the Second Amendment and the potential victims of gun violence. By the way, that last group includes nearly all of us.

Stop by the website. You can sign an online petition, like them on Facebook, make a donation, or just read their perspective. Or maybe several of those things.

Americans for Responsible Solutions encourages a national conversation to address gun violence. The conversation should no longer be dominated by the National Rifle Association (NRA). Let your elected officials know what you think. They want your vote and will listen.

Bloomberg can’t buy America on gun regulation

Bloomberg can’t buy America on gun regulation

National Rifle Association (NRA) CEO Wayne LaPierre says Bloomberg “can’t buy America” in his efforts to influence the gun control argument.

One could also argue that the NRA has for too long dominated any consideration of gun control and opposed rational regulation with great harm to this country.

Time to move toward a solution to Gun violence

Time to move toward a solution to Gun violence

Let me start with a quote:

Dear fellow American,

Two years ago, a mentally ill young man shot me in the head, killed six of my constituents, and wounded 12 others. Since that terrible day, America has seen 11 more mass shootings – but no response from Congress to prevent gun violence. After the massacre of 20 children and six of their teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary though, it’s clear: This time must be different.

Americans for Responsible Solutions will encourage elected officials to stand up for solutions to prevent gun violence and protect responsible gun ownership by communicating directly with the constituents that elect them.

Join us today, and tell your elected leaders that Americans are demanding responsible solutions to reduce gun violence.

That open letter starts the web page for Americans for Responsible Solutions. As you may have guessed by now, that was written by former U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords and her husband Mark Kelly.

They founded Americans for Responsible Solutions to encourage a national conversation to address gun violence. The conversation should no longer be dominated by the National Rifle Association. No matter your opinion, let your elected officials know what you think.

It is certainly a complicated problem and I don’t think we are going to find a simple solution. But we should not allow the complexity to stop us from taking common sense steps in the right direction.

Reasonable and responsible voices need to be heard. Please visit Americans for Responsible Solutions.

CeaseFirePA or Cease Fire PA stop the gun violence in Pennsylvania

CeaseFirePA or Cease Fire PA stop the gun violence in Pennsylvania

Recently I’ve had several posts about gun violence and possible solutions. See Let your government know what you think about gun control, Americans for Responsible Solutions: start a dialog to address gun violence, and Crazy Idea: the NRA stimulus that might save the economy.

Since I am in Pennsylvania, I would like to point out there is a state-wide group concerned with gun violence. The group is CeaseFirePA. Please check out their website for more information on this group.

Let your government know what you think about gun control

Let your government know what you think about gun control

Today I have contacted my Senators and Representative. As a nation and society we are facing a huge problem and we need to discuss it and arrive a a reasonable and responsible solution. Or at least take a few steps in that direction. So contact your federal elected officials. Let your government know what you think about gun control.

They all have websites now and you can contact them through those sites. You could also call or send a letter but the important thing is to let them know what you think.

This is my letter:

Dear xxx,

I believe guns have become a huge problem in our society. There are too many gun deaths and too many mass shootings. I realize this is a complex issue. Today President Obama mentioned a few common sense solutions that should help.

I believe that Congress should ban semiautomatic weapons, particularly assault rifles. It could be argued that only a small portion of gun related deaths are due to semiautomatic weapons. But these mass shootings are horrible. And I know of few, if any, uses for these weapons beside murder. We do have a right to bear arms but if we can restrict automatic weapons, why not these.

I believe we should eliminate loopholes in our background checks. Background checks help to prevent criminals and the mentally ill from getting weapons legally. Why are there gun sales not subject to background checks. How does this interfere with our right to bear arms.

Similar arguments could be made for banning high capacity magazine for these weapons.

I think there should be serious discussions of these issues and hope congress can overcome pressure from the gun lobby in evaluating these problems.

Don’t forget to send yours. You can add a comment here if you want to share your opinions with other readers.

Americans for Responsible Solutions: start a dialog to address gun violence

Americans for Responsible Solutions: start a dialog to address gun violence

Americans for Responsible Solutions is an organization founded to help and encourage our lawmakers to stand-up to the powerful forces that prevent our lawmakers from serious considering and putting into place any laws that will restrict gun ownership in an attempt to prevent the serious problem of gun-related violence in out society. Check out the website of Americans for Responsible Solutions.

U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords was severely wounded and 18 of her constituents killed or wounded by a gunman about 2 years ago. There have been 11 mass shootings since then. Rep. Giffords and her husband Mark Kelly founded Americans for Responsible Solutions to encourage a national conversation to address gun violence. Check out their website and let your Senators and Representatives know your beliefs on this issue.

Crazy Idea: the NRA stimulus that might save the economy

Crazy Idea: the NRA stimulus that might save the economy

After the tragic child murders at Sandy Hook Elementary, the NRA proposed a plan to put armed guards in each school. There are about 99,000 public schools in the country according to National Center for Education Statistics.

NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said:

I call on Congress today to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation and to do it now to make sure that blanket safety is in place when our kids return to school in January.

A few days later (on December 23) he added on Meet the Press:

If it’s crazy to call for putting police and armed security in our school to protect our children, then call me crazy. I’ll tell you what the American people– I think the American people think it’s crazy not to do it. It’s the one thing that would keep people safe.

And the N.R.A. is going to try to do that. We’re going to support an immediate appropriation before Congress to put police officers in every school. And we’re going to work with Asa Hutchinson, who has agreed to work with us to put together a voluntary program, drawing on retired military, drawing on retired police, drawing on former Secret Service, and all these people that can actually go in and make our kids safe.

So he clearly calls for both volunteers and armed police. It is unclear how the numbers will work but with almost 100,000 schools we are clearly talking about a large numbers of jobs and a big federal expenditure.

There would be details to work out and these are by no means trivial. How do the volunteers work with the police? How volunteers will be recruited? How will they screened so we are not creating a worse situation by putting armed people into schools who may themselves cause a problem?

Could there be problems with students or others taking guns from the guards and shooting? This may sound crazy too but a weapon was taken from a police officer is the police station and 3 officers were wounded. (see Police station shooting story).

Just a few months ago, police shot 9 bystanders while killing a lone gunman. Since these were trained police officers, we cannot dismiss the possibility that students or teachers could be shot accidently by the guards.

Many schools will need multiple guards as one person can’t see everything and may not be sufficient to repel the attacker or attackers. Should we depend exclusively on volunteers or police here or have a mix?

Should we think about something similar for other places where the public gathers? Does the private sector need to add an armed presence in shopping malls, private schools, movies theaters, churches, etc.

Do governments need to post armed guards at other facilities open to the public? The Post Office and motor vehicle offices come to mind but there are many others.

This plan is clearly a dilemma for many politicians. Some will like the idea of armed guards in schools as proposed by the NRA but will not like the idea of a large federal program particularly one that uses federal money to create jobs and stimulate the economy. Others will like the idea of a federal stimulus but oppose armed guards in schools.

But it gives each side a bit of what they like. So maybe it is a potential route for compromise. Maybe throw a few more contentious issues into the mix and we’ll have something.

I think the plan will not work but rather than dismissing it as crazy, we should think it through.