Tag: fiscal cliff

Fiscal Cliff: Be flexible in seeking solutions

Fiscal Cliff: Be flexible in seeking solutions

Last year we had a big standoff on raising the national debt ceiling. It was very strange in that Congress has repeatedly passed budgets with deficits over the past several decades and suddenly decided that the national debt had grown too large. Then they decided the best course was just to stop borrowing money.

An apparently simple solution to a growing problem. But perhaps was too simple. People with bonds would like to be paid when the bonds come due. Soldiers and civilian employees both like to be paid. There are quite a few valid concerns raised by this approach.

So in recognition that the problem was a bit more complex then just not spending, Congress agreed to allow debt to rise but mean while would appoint a Super-committee to decide on both revenues and budget cuts which would once again bring fiscal sanity to our federal budget. And to make sure the job was done right, Congress proclaimed that there would be draconian budget cuts and tax increases if we did not have a plan in place by the beginning of next year (which is just a few weeks away now).

So one of the sticking points is income taxes. President Obama is pretty insistent on raising the tax rates on households making over a quarter million dollars per year. Republicans are insistent that this rate won’t be raised.

Everyone would like to see tax cuts continue on for households making less than a quarter million dollars per year (About 98% of us). But Republicans say they won’t agree unless the households making over a quarter million dollars per year are included (about the top 2%).

If there is not an agreement taxes rise on everyone which combined with the draconian budget cuts might be enough to throw this weakly recovering economy back into recession.

So a compromise is needed. Both sides like to repeat their position and do insist that it is the correct position. But there is some movement behind closed doors toward the compromise we need. Some days the reports are promising, other days not so much. Let us hope both side can show some flexibility.

Mitt Romney had a Good  Idea

Mitt Romney had a Good Idea

In defending his tax plan which many analysts thought impossible Mitt Romney did come up with 2 good ideas, one of which may be a partial solution to the fiscal cliff we are facing.

President Obama is pretty insistent on raising the tax rates on households making over a quarter million dollars per year. Republicans are insistent that this rate won’t be raised. This standoff is over the temporary Bush tax cuts which should have expired but were temporarily extended 2 years ago and are now set to expire again at the end of this year.

The Democratic view is that these tax cuts should be kept in place for those households making over a quarter million dollars per year and allowed to expire for those earning more. The Republican view is that the tax cuts should be extended for everyone, regardless of income. Let us just call this the tax rate standoff.

Certainly there are many other tax issues – the estate tax, payroll taxes, dividend taxes, capital gains taxes, carried interest to name a few – but I think Mitt Romney may have suggested the solution to the tax rate standoff.

So here is Mitt’s good idea :

And so, in terms of bringing down deductions, one way of doing that would be say everybody gets — I’ll pick a number — $25,000 of deductions and credits, and you can decide which ones to use. Your home mortgage interest deduction, charity, child tax credit, and so forth, you can use those as part of filling that bucket, if you will, of deductions.

So if rates are kept the same on everyone (as the Republicans want), Congress can still limit deductions to a number which will not adversely effect those households making less than a quarter million dollars per year but would still raise taxes on those households making over a quarter million dollars per year (as the Democrats want).

Of course, it won’t be a sharp divide at a quarter million dollars per year but it meets the spirit of what both sides want to do. I’m not sure if the number picked is the right one and if there should be additional rules but this caps could be the start of a discussion.

Ridiculous pledge, oath of office, and fiscal cliff

Ridiculous pledge, oath of office, and fiscal cliff

As our Congress tries to negotiate the fiscal cliff one of the major difficulties is that many members have pledged not to raise taxes. This ridiculous pledge is to Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.

But members of Congress have taken a more solemn pledge in their oath of office.

A few have now decided to abandon their “no taxes” pledge if it interferes with governing.

I am not sure if this is encouraging news or it is discouraging that there are only a few of these brave souls. I would think it fairly obvious that the oath of office trumps a “no taxes” pledge to a private party.