Tag: politics

Fixing the ACA or Obamacare makes more sense than repeal

Fixing the ACA or Obamacare makes more sense than repeal

It seems that ever since the Affordable Care Act (aka ACA or Obamacare) was passed and then passed muster in court, nearly all Republicans have wanted it repealed. The latest efforts involve shutting down the government as we enter a new fiscal year and refusing to raise the debt ceiling so the government defaults on its debts.

Both efforts seem foolish and I have discussed them recently.

I live in Pennsylvania and get emails from Senator Toomey. He discussed his desire to compromise on the government shut-down stand-off by adding 3 amendments to the Senate bill. These amendments did not make it into the Senate bill. I do not think the debate on Obamacare should be part of the government shut-down or debt ceiling debates but these are good discussion points on the law.

The first would repeal the medical device tax that is costing Pennsylvania jobs; the second would provide relief from the infringement on religious liberty in Obamacare; the third would delay the individual mandate for one year.

I probably would back the repeal of the medical device tax. It seems to me the best way to do this would be a a separate bill but now seems a bit rushed. I don’t see much benefit to this tax since I would assume the tax would just be passed along as part of the cost of health care. So there is really no benefit since the users of heath care pay the tax and there well could be a job loss associated with this. But on the other hand with more people insured and using health care there may not be a job loss. I’d like to see more discussion on this point.

Regarding the second suggestion (infringement on religious liberty), I think this is inevitable as long as we insist on standards in health insurance. I think the employer mandate is problematic. The religious objection of an employer may or may not seem reasonable to others. One person may object to contraception and another may object to this or that aspect of health care. A public option would be much simpler here but I don’t think that is what the Senator had in mind.

As to the third point (a 1 year delay), there may be a problem. I assume the insurance companies took the widened risk-pool provided by the mandate into account when setting the rates for 2014. If this is not the case and we do not have additional delays such as a 1 year delay every year, it might be worth discussing this.

The ACA is a complex law with many parts. There are things I like and things I don’t. There seem to be things we could fix now and problems that would not be apparent until parts of the law are implemented. And we certainly could use a reasonable discussion of the pros and cons of parts of this law.

Rather than have a series of political stand-offs to attempt to repeal the law, maybe Congress could work to improve the law.

No Labels

No Labels

I have my opinions and I have been known to be wrong on occasion. I usually think I’m right but I’m willing to listen to other opinions and maybe reconsider my own opinion. Sometimes I’ll even change my opinion because of that listening.

Unfortunately, many of our so-called leaders don’t think they need to listen. Even worse they are willing to force everyone else to follow what they think is the right path.

You may have guessed by now that I am thinking about Congress. There is a partisan divide where Republicans don’t give Democratic ideas much serious consideration and Democrats don’t give Republican ideas much consideration and the 2 sides don’t compromise much. There are a few Independent and a few in the major parties willing to cross the aisle but not nearly enough of it.

So I have written about this failure of governing before. The political system is making our democracy dysfunctional.

A group called “no labels” is trying to help move us past this political gridlock. Check out the website of No Labels.

Repeal ObamaCare, maybe 37th time is the charm

Repeal ObamaCare, maybe 37th time is the charm

I read today that the House of Representatives is going to try to repeal ObamaCare for the 37th time.

I’m kind of on the edge of my seat here. Will it pass this time? Did it pass all 36 times before?

How long will it take House Republicans to realize that the Affordable Care Act or ObamaCare has been law for a few years and there is no chance of repeal unless the Republicans take over in the Senate and maybe the White House. Wouldn’t their time be better spend in trying to fix parts of the law they find especially objectionable? Or trying to be constructive?

What if repealing ObamaCare actually will increase the deficit as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicted. Will the Republicans agree to raise taxes to make their plan deficit neutral? Or will they cut elsewhere?

Bloomberg can’t buy America on gun regulation

Bloomberg can’t buy America on gun regulation

National Rifle Association (NRA) CEO Wayne LaPierre says Bloomberg “can’t buy America” in his efforts to influence the gun control argument.

One could also argue that the NRA has for too long dominated any consideration of gun control and opposed rational regulation with great harm to this country.

When the going gets tough, Congress gets going

When the going gets tough, Congress gets going

We avoided the fiscal cliff at the beginning of the year by just delaying the massive budget cuts known as sequestration.

So now that the delay is almost up and we have less than 2 weeks to solve the problem (or delay again) was does Congress do? They leave town (go into recess) for a week.

The old saying is “When the going gets tough, the tough get going.”

Does this mean our Congress is tough?

Rise to Greatness: Abraham Lincoln and America’s Most Perilous Year by David Von Drehle

Rise to Greatness: Abraham Lincoln and America’s Most Perilous Year by David Von Drehle

Rise to Greatness: Abraham Lincoln and America’s Most Perilous Year by David Von Drehle was on my Christmas list for 2012. I did get it and I’m reading it now and thought this might be a good time to talk about the book. But let me tell you first why it was on my list.

I have long been an admirer of David Von Drehle’s writing. I had read Triangle: The Fire That Changed America many years ago. In 1911 a fire at the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York City killed over 100 workers. This stood as the worst workplace disaster in New York City until September 11 2001. Most of the workers at the Triangle factory were poor women from the lower eastside on Manhattan. Some were burned; others jumped to their deaths. It was a horrible incident and changed the American workplace. I really was impressed with the way that David Von Drehle told the story.

Skip ahead to last year and I subscribed to Time magazine. I started noticing articles by David Von Drehle. The name was familiar. So I checked and it was the Triangle author. Then late last year, an issue came out with a few big stories on the new Lincoln movie. And there was a mention of his book. So I added that to my list.

So enough background. What do I think of the book? The short version is “I like it!” But since this a book review, I really should go into a bit more detail.

As suggested by the title Rise to Greatness: Abraham Lincoln and America’s Most Perilous Year this does focus on one year. And that year is 1862. Since it is a calender year story, it makes sense to tell it chronologically and that is what Von Drehle with 12 monthly chapters. But before the monthly chapters comes a prologue to set the stage. And a chapter on New Years Day to flesh out the prologue, introduce some key characters, and get us into the chronological part.

It is clear that the United States is in big trouble. Many states have seceded. The federal government is broke. The was costs are several times the previous federal budgets. Even among the states who stay in the Union, there is widespread disagreement on several issues but most especially slavery. The rebels are doing well militarily. And the future of the United States is in doubt. Then there are international issues. It is really unclear if the country lawyer can handle all of this.

But during 1862 Lincoln becomes the leader we need. I’m over half way though the book now. I just finished June. I can’t comment on the end because I’m not there yet. But so far the author is doing a great job at describing the progress of the war and the political pressure on the new president.

My one quibble is maps. There are some and they really help in following military campaigns. But I am a big map fan and wish there were more maps.

So here are a few reviews I found:

Overall, I’d say this was a very good book. All the reviews I’ve seen seem to agree on that. And there are another 50 or so reviews on Amazon if you just click on the image of the book above.

It does focus on one critical year in Lincoln’s presidency so it is not a full biography or a full telling of the civil war. But it is a wonderful book about a very critical year. I highly recommend it.

Crazy Idea: the NRA stimulus that might save the economy

Crazy Idea: the NRA stimulus that might save the economy

After the tragic child murders at Sandy Hook Elementary, the NRA proposed a plan to put armed guards in each school. There are about 99,000 public schools in the country according to National Center for Education Statistics.

NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said:

I call on Congress today to act immediately to appropriate whatever is necessary to put armed police officers in every single school in this nation and to do it now to make sure that blanket safety is in place when our kids return to school in January.

A few days later (on December 23) he added on Meet the Press:

If it’s crazy to call for putting police and armed security in our school to protect our children, then call me crazy. I’ll tell you what the American people– I think the American people think it’s crazy not to do it. It’s the one thing that would keep people safe.

And the N.R.A. is going to try to do that. We’re going to support an immediate appropriation before Congress to put police officers in every school. And we’re going to work with Asa Hutchinson, who has agreed to work with us to put together a voluntary program, drawing on retired military, drawing on retired police, drawing on former Secret Service, and all these people that can actually go in and make our kids safe.

So he clearly calls for both volunteers and armed police. It is unclear how the numbers will work but with almost 100,000 schools we are clearly talking about a large numbers of jobs and a big federal expenditure.

There would be details to work out and these are by no means trivial. How do the volunteers work with the police? How volunteers will be recruited? How will they screened so we are not creating a worse situation by putting armed people into schools who may themselves cause a problem?

Could there be problems with students or others taking guns from the guards and shooting? This may sound crazy too but a weapon was taken from a police officer is the police station and 3 officers were wounded. (see Police station shooting story).

Just a few months ago, police shot 9 bystanders while killing a lone gunman. Since these were trained police officers, we cannot dismiss the possibility that students or teachers could be shot accidently by the guards.

Many schools will need multiple guards as one person can’t see everything and may not be sufficient to repel the attacker or attackers. Should we depend exclusively on volunteers or police here or have a mix?

Should we think about something similar for other places where the public gathers? Does the private sector need to add an armed presence in shopping malls, private schools, movies theaters, churches, etc.

Do governments need to post armed guards at other facilities open to the public? The Post Office and motor vehicle offices come to mind but there are many others.

This plan is clearly a dilemma for many politicians. Some will like the idea of armed guards in schools as proposed by the NRA but will not like the idea of a large federal program particularly one that uses federal money to create jobs and stimulate the economy. Others will like the idea of a federal stimulus but oppose armed guards in schools.

But it gives each side a bit of what they like. So maybe it is a potential route for compromise. Maybe throw a few more contentious issues into the mix and we’ll have something.

I think the plan will not work but rather than dismissing it as crazy, we should think it through.

Republican Party of Ignorance

Republican Party of Ignorance

There seems to be a battle within the Republican Party as to whether they are the Party of Ignorance or the Party of Stupid.

But the saying is:

“Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.”

Education can fix the ignorance problem but the Republicans do not seem interested in learning. They are willfully ignorant of basic knowledge and this should be unacceptable.

In “1984” George Orwell’s dystopian and satirical novel the Party that stayed in control of the government used the slogan Ignorance Is Strength. Perhaps the Republicans are on to something.

It may be a good time to do some actual governing

It may be a good time to do some actual governing

Now that the election is over, it may be a good time to do some actual governing. Seems the parties need to find enough common ground to reach a compromise and prevent us from falling off a fiscal cliff on this next January. Refusal to compromise could put us back in recession ( http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20121107-720595.html )

The Romney-Ryan anti-choice team

The Romney-Ryan anti-choice team

I thought I would look back on a previous post and repeat much of what I said but emphasize the anti-choice aspects of it.

This is a quote from the Vice Presidential Debate last month. The link to the entire transcript is the my original post.

Representative Ryan:

“That’s why — those are the reasons why I’m pro-life.

Now, I understand this is a difficult issue. And I respect people who don’t agree with me on this. But the policy of a Romney administration will be to oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother.”

Rep. Ryan is saying that he respects people who disagree with his belief but the favors a law that would force them to comply with his belief.

Or more accurately, they must comply with Gov. Romney’s belief because Rep. Ryan doesn’t believe in those exceptions but does defer to the top of the ticket.

So I guess if you are anti-choice and favor the repeal of Roe v Wade, the Romney-Ryan team is for you. If you are pro-choice, the issue is also pretty clear.

Podcast: misleading politicians

Podcast: misleading politicians

Politicians tell voters what they want to hear, even when it makes no sense.

I mentioned before that I like to walk and when I don’t have company, I usually listen to podcasts. Today I was listening to the Freakonomics podcast “We the Sheeple”.

The guest was Bryan Caplan, Professor of Economics at George Mason University, who is not a big fan of our political system and politicians. In his words,

You know, if you’re a successful politician, you know you don’t succeed by figuring out what’s really going on in the world and trying to explain it to people. You need to find out what people what to hear and then tell it to them. That’s what you see in debates. That’s what you see voters, successful politicians instinctively are trying to read people, trying to read their faces, what does this person want me to say to him, and that’s how they win.

It was a very interesting discussion for those of us who are a bit skeptical about what politicians tell us. It would be a bit of an eye-opener for those who believe everything they say, even if it doesn’t seem to pass the common sense test.

Mitt Romney is now the candidate of big change or big flip-flop

Mitt Romney is now the candidate of big change or big flip-flop

So Mitt Romney is now the candidate of big change. Sounds very 2008 when President Obama was a candidate of hope and change.

I guess the difference is that I liked some of President Obama’s changes. I think it is good that health insurers can’t turn down people with pre-existing medical conditions. And it is good that insurers cannot cap your coverage if you have some really big claims. It seems good that insurers cannot find a reason to deny coverage if you are sick. There will be problems with health care reform and we need to elect people who will modify the reform to get it right.

I like that the economy is not falling apart and we are not losing hundreds of thousands of jobs each month as we did in the year before Obama took office. It seems the Presidents Bush and Obama (and Congress) took the right steps in late 2008 and 2009 to reverse the trend. Certainly things could be much better and I think they probably would be if Republicans in congress did not block many of President Obama’s efforts. But I see nothing to indicate Governor Romney would do any better.

I like that Obama seems to have a thoughtful foreign policy.

But Governor Romney is also known for his changes or flip-flops. I am surprised he wants to remind voters about that.

More RINOs and DINOs needed

More RINOs and DINOs needed

One of my pet peeves is the excessive partisanship in our political life. It would be nice if our Congress was composed of men and women who could think and act independently and govern the country in what they believe is the best interest of the people they represent. Sadly, there is excessive loyalty to political parties and a lack of ability of compromise for the good of the country.

Political parties have become too powerful. I have previously written many times about this “cancer at the heart of our democracy” (follow my partisanship tag for more).

There is a type of politician called RINO for Republican In Name Only. I suppose there is another group called DINO for Democrat In Name Only. If so, I have certainly heard that term less often.

Usually such a term is used to indicate a lack of party loyalty. And party loyalists consider it a bad thing. But I think it is a good thing. It shows that the politician in question can think independently and is willing to stand-up to the party for the good of constituents or the good of the country.

Think of how good it would be to have a Congress full of people who are willing to act for the good of the country and govern. Support your local RINO, DINO, or independent.

Romney’s 12 million job promise

Romney’s 12 million job promise

Mitt Romney has mentioned many times that his policies will add 12 million jobs. In the recent debate ( transcript here ) he specified this would happen in 4 years and is a result of his five-point plan.

That’s why I put out a five-point plan that gets America 12 million new jobs in four years and rising take-home pay.

Or at least that is what he seems to be saying.

Dana Milbank of the Washington Post has written an article called Romney’s facts are curious things. A great article that examines this 12 million jobs claim. Turns out there is no strong tie to his 5 point plan and the 4 years thing is a bit fuzzy too. But read the article. You’ll be glad you did.

What are Mitt Romney’s education policies?

What are Mitt Romney’s education policies?

I was trying to find out a bit more about Mitt Romney’s education policies since in both debates he seemed to come across as very pro-education. What I’ve found didn’t seem very consistent with his statements in the debates.

In both debates he indicated that he thought education was important and would not cut education funding. In the first debate, he mentions Massachusetts schools being #1 in the country and seemed to be talking about K-12 education. In the second debate, his answer to the college student promised a growth in Pell grants and a loan program. It was unclear whether he was promising a new program or continuation or the existing program. But he seemed to support higher education.

According to Valerie Strauss an education writer for the Washington Post, Massachusetts schools may have been #1 in some ranking but not the one usually used. Furthermore, while Massachusetts schools were once excellent, they declined while Romney was governor (but are still very good). And Romney supports the budget of his running mate which included big cuts for education.

Will the real Mitt Romney please stand up?

I also noticed that his website includes a group called Educators for Romney. That section seems to be a blog with 2 entries. A general comment on the debate by an advisor. And an entry on education by Rod Paige a former Secretary of Education. They may want to beef-up this section of the website.

Those of us who remember the George W. Bush years, remember Rod Paige as Bush’s secretary of education. We were told he was the Houston School Superintendent who greatly reduced the dropout rate. It turned out out that this outstanding feat was the result of cooking the books. But perhaps his greatest claim to fame is calling National Education Association a “terrorist organization” . He later claimed it was a bad joke, but clearly this is not a man who would get on well with the millions of teachers in the NEA.

This got me curious about his other education advisors. Turns out that many were advisors to President George W. Bush .